Could Trump sink the Russia collusion probe?

Published Nov 8, 2018


Washington - Donald Trump emerged from midterm elections promising cooperation only to plunge Washington into turmoil Thursday over suspicions that he's trying to kill the Russia collusion probe and an extraordinary intensification of his war with journalists.

Nothing provokes the anger of the fiery and unconventional president more than special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into whether his campaign colluded with Russian agents during his 2016 election.

Trump has continuously threatened that he has the power to shut down what he calls "a witch hunt" and on Wednesday he took the first potential step in that direction when he replaced his attorney general, Jeff Sessions, with loyalist Matthew Whitaker.

The switch, announced on Trump's Twitter feed, provoked instant consternation across Washington, where politicians from both sides of the aisle have long warned that political interference in Mueller's work cannot be tolerated.

Democrats, who won the lower house of Congress in Tuesday's midterm elections, now see Trump as close to crossing that line with the ultimate goal of covering up alleged crimes.

"Interference with the special counsel's investigation would cause a constitutional crisis and undermine the rule of law. If the president seeks to interfere in the impartial administration of justice, the Congress must stop him. No one is above the law," said Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee.

'Enemy of the people'

The midterm elections saw the Democrats win control of the lower house of Congress for the first time in eight years, meaning Trump will finally face an opposition that has teeth.

However, with Republicans tightening their grip on the Senate, a magnanimous sounding Trump suggested that a divided Congress would provide opportunity for bipartisan cooperation -- something in low supply in Washington.

"Everybody is in love," he said at a White House press conference.

But that love dried up as soon as reporters began asking questions that Trump found offensive.

CNN's Jim Acosta, who regularly spars with Trump and his spokeswoman Sarah Sanders, was branded by the president an "enemy of the people" and a "rude, terrible person" when he refused to give up the mic and kept putting questions, including about the Russia probe.

The row, carried live on national TV networks, was followed by Trump issuing angry put-downs to several other reporters. Shortly after, the White House took the extremely rare measure of revoking Acosta's press pass.

Could Trump sink probe?

Spats between Trump and journalists can sometimes seem circus-like, but critics say the president's hot temper illustrates his deeper lack of respect for Washington norms -- and allegedly for the law.

Those concerns are now focused on the future of the Mueller probe, which began as a look into alleged links with Russians seeking to disrupt the election and expanded into an investigation of billionaire Trump's murky finances, including his business ties to Russia.

As Mueller has got closer to the heart of the Trump family's closely guarded financial secrets, the president has become more enraged.

"It was supposed to be on collusion. There's no collusion," Trump said Wednesday. "They went after people with tax problems, from years ago. They went after people with loans and other things. Had nothing to do with my campaign."

Whitaker now becomes Mueller's new boss and judging by past statements he will be sympathetic towards Trump.

Sessions had recused himself from the investigation, because of his own contacts with Russians during the 2016 campaign, instead handing responsibility for Mueller to his deputy Rod Rosenstein. An infuriated Trump responded by repeatedly and publicly seeking to humiliate Sessions.

Whitaker has made no public comment since being named, but he has previously shown distinct scepticism about the probe, including calling for its scope to be curtailed.

In 2017 he even used Trump's words, warning against Mueller engaging in a "witch hunt."

In the House of Representatives, the senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee -- which Democrats will control from January -- called for an investigation of Sessions' firing.

"This must begin immediately, and if not, then a Democratic Congress will make this a priority in January," Jerry Nadler warned.

Republicans, however, have been mostly silent. 

One of the exceptions, Senator Susan Collins, said non-interference in the Mueller probe was "imperative."